Why Are Iran And Israel Fighting? Unpacking A Decades-Long Rivalry

Mitchel Kulas 07 Jul 2025

The Middle East is a region often characterized by complex geopolitical dynamics, and few rivalries are as deeply entrenched and potentially volatile as the one between Iran and Israel. Recent events, such as the strike on Iran's consulate in Syria and Iran's subsequent vows of retaliation, have brought this long-simmering conflict into sharp focus, prompting many to ask: why are Iran and Israel fighting? This isn't a new confrontation, but rather the culmination of decades of shifting alliances, ideological clashes, and a relentless pursuit of regional dominance and security.

What began as a cold standoff rooted in nuclear ambitions and ideological rivalry now threatens to ignite the Middle East, with the world watching nervously. Understanding the multifaceted origins and ongoing escalations of this conflict is crucial for grasping the broader regional landscape and the potential for wider international implications. This article delves into the historical context, key flashpoints, and underlying motivations that continue to fuel the animosity between these two significant powers.

The Seeds of Conflict: From Allies to Archenemies
Ideological Divide and Regional Ambitions
The Nuclear Question: A Core Grievance
Escalation Points: Syria, Gaza, and Beyond
The Cost of Conflict: Civilian Lives and Regional Stability
A Simmering Cold War: Covert Operations and Open Threats
International Alliances and Global Implications
Understanding the Future of the Conflict

The Seeds of Conflict: From Allies to Archenemies

To truly comprehend why Iran and Israel are fighting today, one must journey back in time, beyond the recent headlines, to a period when their relationship was starkly different. The historical relationship between Iran and Israel, as well as their wider operations and proxies in the Middle East, is complex and has undergone a dramatic transformation. For decades, prior to 1979, relations between the two nations were surprisingly cordial, even strategic. Both countries, situated in a volatile region, saw mutual benefits in cooperation, particularly as non-Arab states facing a common Arab nationalist front. Israel supplied Iran with military and intelligence assistance, while Iran provided Israel with oil.

The 1979 Revolution: A Turning Point

The pivotal moment that irrevocably altered this dynamic was Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution. This seismic event transformed previously cordial relations between Iran and Israel to fierce hostility. The origins of the rivalry between the Islamic Republic and the Jewish state trace back directly to the overthrow of Israel’s close ally, the authoritarian Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini’s forces. The new revolutionary government in Tehran, driven by a radical Islamist ideology, immediately adopted an anti-Zionist stance. The 1979 revolution changed their relationship dramatically, with Tehran becoming a vocal supporter of Palestinians and viewing Israel as an illegitimate, occupying entity in Muslim lands.

This ideological shift wasn't merely rhetorical. It laid the groundwork for a foreign policy centered on confronting what Iran perceived as Western imperialism and its regional allies, with Israel at the forefront. From allies to archenemies, how did they get here? It was this fundamental ideological realignment that planted the seeds of the enduring conflict, transforming two nations that once shared strategic interests into bitter adversaries locked in a struggle for regional influence and existential security.

Ideological Divide and Regional Ambitions

Beyond the historical rupture of 1979, the ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel is deeply rooted in a profound ideological divide and competing regional ambitions. Iran, under its revolutionary Islamic leadership, envisions itself as the leader of the "Axis of Resistance," a network of anti-Western and anti-Israel groups spanning the Middle East. This vision directly clashes with Israel's desire for regional stability and its role as a key Western ally.

Support for Proxies and Regional Influence

One of the primary ways this ideological and geopolitical struggle manifests is through the extensive use of proxies. Iran has cultivated and supported a wide array of non-state actors, including Hezbollah in Lebanon, various Shiite militias in Iraq, the Houthis in Yemen, and Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad in Gaza. These groups serve as Iran's forward operating bases, extending its reach and influence across the region, often directly threatening Israel's borders and interests. This strategy allows Iran to exert pressure and engage in conflict without direct military confrontation, creating a "ring of fire" around Israel.

For Israel, these Iranian-backed proxies represent an existential threat. The proliferation of advanced weaponry, including rockets and missiles, into the hands of groups like Hezbollah, is a constant source of alarm. Israel views Iran's regional expansionism, often dubbed the "Shiite Crescent," as an attempt to encircle and undermine its security. This proxy warfare is a key component of why Iran and Israel are fighting; it's a shadow war played out through various battlegrounds, from the Gaza Strip to the Syrian border, where both sides constantly probe and counter each other's moves. The conflict between Israel and Iran has shaped the Middle East for decades, largely through this intricate web of alliances and proxy engagements.

The Nuclear Question: A Core Grievance

At the heart of Israel's gravest security concerns regarding Iran lies the Islamic Republic's nuclear program. Israel believes Iran is a threat to its security despite Iran’s insistence that it doesn’t want nuclear weapons. This fundamental disagreement over Iran's nuclear intentions is a central pillar of why Iran and Israel are fighting, or at least why Israel perceives Iran as an immediate and profound danger.

For Israel, a nuclear-armed Iran is an unacceptable scenario. Given Iran's revolutionary ideology, its calls for Israel's destruction, and its support for hostile proxy groups, Israel views any Iranian progress towards nuclear weapons capability as an existential threat. Israel has a long-standing policy of preventing hostile states from acquiring weapons of mass destruction, and it has demonstrated a willingness to act unilaterally to achieve this goal, as seen in its past actions against Iraqi and Syrian nuclear facilities.

Consequently, Israel has carried out an extraordinary series of attacks on Iran, aiming at their nuclear facilities and top military officials. These operations, often covert, have included cyberattacks, sabotage, and assassinations of nuclear scientists, all designed to delay or disrupt Iran's nuclear program. These actions are a clear manifestation of Israel's determination to prevent Iran from crossing the nuclear threshold. While Iran consistently maintains its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, primarily energy generation, Israel remains deeply skeptical, citing Iran's past deception regarding its nuclear activities and its continued enrichment of uranium to levels far beyond what is typically required for civilian power generation.

This "cold standoff rooted in nuclear ambitions" has been a persistent source of tension, fueling a clandestine war of intelligence and sabotage. The fear of a nuclear Iran is arguably the most potent driver of Israel's aggressive posture towards the Islamic Republic, making it a critical factor in understanding why Iran and Israel are fighting.

Escalation Points: Syria, Gaza, and Beyond

While the underlying ideological and nuclear tensions are constant, the conflict between Iran and Israel often flares up dramatically at specific flashpoints across the region. These moments of heightened tension and direct engagement provide crucial insights into the evolving nature of their rivalry and why Iran and Israel are fighting with increasing intensity.

The Syria Consulate Strike and Its Aftermath

A recent and significant escalation point was the strike on Iran's consulate in Syria. Iran blames Israel for a strike on its Syria consulate, and has vowed to retaliate. This incident, which resulted in the deaths of high-ranking Iranian military officials, was a direct attack on Iranian sovereign territory (diplomatic missions are considered sovereign) and a significant escalation from Israel's usual targeting of Iranian assets or proxies in Syria. For years, while minor clashes occurred consistently during the Syria war and Israel's encroachment over Golan Heights in Syria, the conflict between Israel and Iran remained hidden and simmering. Israel frequently conducted airstrikes in Syria, targeting Iranian weapons shipments to Hezbollah and Iranian military installations, but a direct strike on a diplomatic facility marked a new, more audacious level of engagement.

Iran's vow to retaliate was swift and serious, leading to an unprecedented direct missile and drone attack on Israel. Iran launched at least 180 missiles into Israel on Tuesday, the latest in a series of rapidly escalating attacks between Israel and Iran and its Arab allies. This direct exchange of fire, rather than through proxies, highlighted the dangerously thin line between a shadow war and open conflict. Iran's retaliation may involve attacks not just on Israeli and US assets but allies and oil installations in the Persian Gulf, underscoring the potential for widespread regional disruption.

Hypothetical 2025 Conflict: A Data Point

The provided data also references a hypothetical future scenario that illustrates the perceived trajectory of this conflict: "An armed conflict between Iran and Israel began when Israel launched surprise attacks on key military and nuclear facilities in Iran on 13 June 2025, in the midst of the Gaza war and its broader regional spillover, [35][36] in the opening hours of the war, Israeli air and ground forces assassinated some of Iran's prominent military leaders, nuclear scientists, [37] and politicians." While this is a hypothetical future scenario from the provided data, it reflects the very real fears and strategic planning within both nations regarding a potential direct war. It suggests a scenario where Israel might launch pre-emptive strikes against Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure, especially if it perceives a critical threat, perhaps exacerbated by ongoing regional conflicts like the Gaza war.

This hypothetical scenario, even if not a prediction, underscores the constant state of readiness and the strategic calculations being made on both sides. Tensions between Iran and Israel have erupted into open conflict, marked by airstrikes, drone attacks, and fears of a wider regional war. This continuous cycle of escalation and retaliation, often tied to events in Gaza or Syria, demonstrates that the question of why Iran and Israel are fighting is not just about historical grievances but about active, ongoing military and intelligence engagements that could spiral out of control at any moment. The war between Israel and Iran continues to rage on, with both sides ramping up deadly attacks on one another, threatening to engulf the region in a broader conflict.

The Cost of Conflict: Civilian Lives and Regional Stability

The escalating conflict between Iran and Israel, whether direct or through proxies, carries a devastating human cost and poses a severe threat to regional stability. When tensions erupt into open warfare, it is often civilians who bear the brunt of the violence, becoming unintended victims in a geopolitical chess match. The civilian toll Iran’s ballistic missile attacks on Israel during the 12 days of war claimed the lives of 28 people — all but one of them civilians — and wounded over 3,000 people. These figures are a stark reminder of the tragic consequences of military actions, highlighting the indiscriminate nature of missile attacks and the widespread suffering they inflict.

Beyond the immediate casualties, the ongoing hostilities perpetuate a cycle of fear, displacement, and economic disruption across the Middle East. Each escalation, each act of retaliation, further destabilizes an already fragile region. Infrastructure is damaged, livelihoods are destroyed, and the prospect of lasting peace recedes further. The continuous "ramping up of deadly attacks on one another" by both sides creates an environment where the risk of miscalculation is extremely high, potentially leading to a full-scale regional war that would have catastrophic consequences far beyond the immediate belligerents.

The question of why Iran and Israel are fighting is not merely academic; it has tangible, often tragic, impacts on the lives of millions. The civilian toll, the constant threat of wider conflict, and the perpetual state of insecurity underscore the urgent need for de-escalation, even as the deep-seated animosities persist. The potential for the conflict to "engulf the region in a broader conflict" is a constant, terrifying possibility that looms over every new development.

A Simmering Cold War: Covert Operations and Open Threats

For much of its recent history, the rivalry between Iran and Israel has been characterized as a "cold war," fought primarily through covert operations, cyberattacks, and proxy conflicts rather than direct, declared warfare. This clandestine struggle is a significant part of understanding why Iran and Israel are fighting in the shadows, even as the threat of open confrontation looms large.

Israel has carried out an extraordinary series of attacks on Iran, aiming at their nuclear facilities and top military officials. These operations often involve highly sophisticated intelligence gathering, sabotage, and targeted assassinations. The goal is typically to degrade Iran's military capabilities, particularly its nuclear program, and to disrupt its ability to support proxy groups. These actions are rarely officially acknowledged by Israel, maintaining a strategic ambiguity that allows for deniability while sending a clear message to Tehran.

Similarly, Iran engages in its own forms of covert warfare, often through cyberattacks targeting Israeli infrastructure or intelligence operations aimed at gathering information and potentially disrupting Israeli systems. The "shaky truce between Israel and Iran, announced after U.S. attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, appeared to be holding" at various points, illustrating the ebb and flow of this covert conflict. These periods of relative calm are often punctuated by sudden escalations, such as drone attacks or missile strikes, which serve as reminders that the conflict, though often hidden, is very much alive.

What began as a cold standoff rooted in nuclear ambitions and ideological rivalry now threatens to ignite the Middle East. The constant low-level conflict, punctuated by these significant covert actions, keeps both sides on high alert and contributes to the pervasive sense of insecurity in the region. The "operation is expected to last 'weeks, not days,' according" to some assessments during periods of heightened tension, highlighting the sustained nature of these covert campaigns and the potential for them to transition into more overt, prolonged engagements. This intricate dance of covert action and veiled threats is a fundamental aspect of why Iran and Israel are fighting, shaping the contours of their long-standing rivalry.

International Alliances and Global Implications

The conflict between Iran and Israel is not an isolated bilateral dispute; it is deeply intertwined with a complex web of international alliances and carries significant global implications. How do you see the conflict affecting international alliances, particularly between Israel, Iran, and other global powers? The answer is that it profoundly reshapes them, creating new alignments and exacerbating existing tensions.

For Israel, its alliance with the United States is paramount. The U.S. provides crucial military aid, diplomatic support, and intelligence sharing, acting as a strategic deterrent against Iran and its proxies. Any direct confrontation between Iran and Israel inevitably draws in the U.S., as seen in the discussions around potential Iranian retaliation involving "attacks not just on Israeli and US assets." This deep alliance means that an escalation between Iran and Israel quickly becomes a matter of global concern, potentially pulling in other Western powers.

On the other side, Iran has forged alliances with various non-state actors and, increasingly, with global powers like Russia and China. These relationships provide Iran with diplomatic cover, economic lifelines (especially under sanctions), and military technology. Russia's involvement in Syria, for instance, has complicated Israel's ability to operate freely against Iranian targets there. China's economic ties with Iran also offer a degree of insulation from Western pressure.

The conflict also impacts regional alliances. Israel has been actively pursuing normalization agreements with Arab states, partly driven by a shared concern over Iranian expansionism. The Abraham Accords are a prime example of this strategy, aiming to build a broader regional front against Tehran. However, the intensity of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, particularly the Gaza war and its broader regional spillover, can complicate these normalization efforts, as it often galvanizes Arab public opinion against Israel and inadvertently strengthens Iran's narrative of resistance.

Ultimately, the escalating tensions between Iran and Israel have the potential to disrupt global energy markets, trigger refugee crises, and even lead to direct military confrontations involving major world powers. The world is watching, fully aware that a misstep in this volatile rivalry could have ripple effects that extend far beyond the Middle East, making the question of why Iran and Israel are fighting a matter of international security and stability.

Understanding the Future of the Conflict

The conflict between Israel and Iran has shaped the Middle East for decades, and its future trajectory remains uncertain, fraught with danger. The question of why Iran and Israel are fighting is not easily answered with a single cause, but rather a complex interplay of historical grievances, ideological clashes, security imperatives, and regional power dynamics. The current state, marked by airstrikes, drone attacks, and fears of a wider regional war, is a testament to the deep-seated animosity that shows little sign of abating.

Both sides are deeply entrenched in their positions. Israel views Iran as an existential threat due to its nuclear ambitions, its calls for Israel's destruction, and its extensive network of proxy forces. Iran, conversely, sees Israel as an illegitimate outpost of Western influence and a direct threat to its revolutionary ideals and regional aspirations. This fundamental divergence makes de-escalation incredibly challenging.

The future of this conflict will likely be shaped by several key factors: the pace of Iran's nuclear program, the stability of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the effectiveness of international diplomacy, and the willingness of global powers to intervene or mediate. A shaky truce might hold for a period, but the underlying tensions ensure that the war between Israel and Iran continues to rage on, often beneath the surface, but always with the potential for sudden and dramatic escalation. The civilian toll, the constant threat of broader regional conflict, and the profound impact on international alliances underscore the urgent need for a path towards stability, however distant it may seem.

Conclusion

The rivalry between Iran and Israel is far more than a simple geopolitical squabble; it is a profound and dangerous confrontation rooted in historical shifts, ideological clashes, and competing visions for the Middle East. From the dramatic transformation of their relationship after Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution to the current high-stakes game of covert operations, proxy wars, and direct military exchanges, the question of why Iran and Israel are fighting encapsulates the region's most pressing security challenges. The nuclear question remains a central flashpoint, while ongoing conflicts in Syria and Gaza serve as constant catalysts for escalation, tragically claiming civilian lives and threatening broader regional stability.

As international alliances shift and global powers watch nervously, the potential for this long-simmering conflict to ignite into a full-scale war remains a chilling possibility. Understanding these complex dynamics is not just for policymakers; it's crucial for anyone seeking to comprehend the forces shaping our world. The future of the Middle East, and indeed global security, hinges significantly on how this decades-long rivalry between Iran and Israel continues to unfold.

What are your thoughts on the future of this conflict? Do you believe a resolution is possible, or are we destined for continued escalation? Share your perspectives in the comments below, and if you found this analysis insightful, please consider sharing it with others who are trying to make sense of this critical geopolitical struggle.

Plus de 200 illustrations gratuites de Pourquoi et de Question - Pixabay

3,107 Word Why Stock Photos - Free & Royalty-Free Stock Photos from

「なぜ」の英語表現は「Why」だけじゃない！Why以外も使えるフレーズ集 - ネイティブキャンプ英会話ブログ | 英会話の豆知識や情報満載

Accelerate Your Potential